VAT
Italy – uses AI to tackle VAT Fraud – Is Your Master Data Prepared?
- The Italian tax authority, in partnership with Sogei and the Ministry of Finance, has introduced an AI-powered chatbot that works alongside the existing VeRa algorithm to check VAT returns.
- This chatbot actively analysis VAT filings in real time, identifying anomalies (e.g., mismatched invoices, undeclared income).
- Alerts are shared instantly with tax officers to priorities high-risk cases and accelerate enforcement.
- In 2022, over 1 million suspect filings were detected through AI. In parallel, targeted VAT adjustments will apply.
Recommendation: We recommend that companies proactively clean and standardize their tax data to reduce compliance risks and prepare for AI-driven tax enforcement.
Portugal – Updated VAT compliance procedures
As of July 2025, Portugal is streamlining its VAT compliance procedures with new guidance. This should ease filing obligations and clarify key thresholds for businesses.
Key Changes:
- Taxpayers can opt into monthly filing without being bound for a minimum of 3 years (previously required).
- Frequency changes (monthly ↔ quarterly) must be requested by filing an amendment in January, effective from 1 January.
- Taxpayers with turnover ≥ EUR 650’000 in the previous year must file VAT returns monthly, starting January 2026.
- Turnover calculation for periodicity excludes certain operations and is based on normal business activities.
- Restrictions remain for taxpayers benefiting from monthly VAT refund or import VAT payment via periodic returns (must be done electronically on the tax portal with specific deadlines).
- Changes in filing frequency are no longer made by the Tax Authority automatically, except in cases of non-compliance.
Recommendation: We recommend reviewing your 2025 turnover projections to determine your applicable VAT return frequency in 2026 and planning the required system and reporting adjustments accordingly.
European Union – New VAT approach for distance sales of imported goods and import VAT
Key Update:
- The Council has agreed on a directive to improve the collection of VAT on imported goods by making the supplier liable for the VAT paid on imports, encouraging use of the VAT Import One-Stop Shop (IOSS) regime.
- IOSS allows foreign traders or platforms to register in a single member state to simplify VAT declaration and payment for sales made throughout the EU.
- By requiring upfront VAT payments at the point of purchase, it shifts the burden of VAT collection from consumers to platforms and protects member states' tax revenues.
- The update streamlines VAT compliance for online sellers and enhances VAT collection efficiency.
- Non-IOSS users may face fallback mechanisms (e.g., VAT payable by the customer before delivery).
Recommendation: We recommend checking whether IOSS regime should be used in your case.
Customs
Changes in the US Trade and Tariff Policy
Recent developments in the US trade policy under President Trump have led to significant changes, particularly in the area of tariffs and trade regulations. In April, a series of announcements and new regulations marked a period of escalating trade tensions between the US and China. President Trump imposed multiple rounds of tariffs on Chinese goods, with rates ultimately reaching a peak of 145%. In response, China implemented its own tariffs on US imports, peaking at 125%. During this period, the US also ended the de minimis exemption for low-value imports from China and Hong Kong, making all such packages subject to tariffs. At the same time, China introduced new export licensing requirements for seven types of rare earth elements, further tightening its control over these critical materials.
Amid these escalations, both countries entered negotiations and reached a temporary agreement in Geneva. This agreement reduced tariffs to 30% for the US and 10% for China and included a 90-day pause on the introduction of additional trade barriers.
The Trump administration also targeted specific products with tariffs: as of 3 April 2025, a 25% ad valorem tariff was imposed on automobiles, followed by a 25% ad valorem tariff on automobile parts as of 3 May 2025. Furthermore, on 4 June 2025, tariffs on steel and aluminium were increased from 25% to 50%.
After many complaints submitted into the various US Courts, in June 2025 the US Court of International Trade intervened, ruling that some of the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration exceeded presidential authority. The administration appeal to this decision resulted in an administrative stay on the reciprocal and fentanyl tariffs until the court proceedings conclude.
In addition to the above developments, the United Kingdom became the second country to reach a trade agreement with the US. Announced in mid-June 2025, the agreement established an annual tariff-rate quota allowing up to 100,000 UK-made automobiles to be imported into the US at a reduced combined tariff rate of 10%. UK automobile parts intended for use in these vehicles are also eligible for the reduced 10% tariff instead of the standard 25%. The agreement further provides for the establishment of similar tariff-rate quota schemes for UK steel and aluminium imports, as well as preferential treatment for UK pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients.
The third country that reached a deal with the White House is Vietnam, which will be subject to 20% ad valorem tariffs instead of 46% that were announced on 2 April 2025.
Furthermore, on 7 July 2025 it was announced that the suspension of the country specific reciprocal tariffs was extended until 1 August 2025. Furthermore, it was also announced that the US president starts to send letters to the heads of following states to inform them about new tariffs rates. Based on this announcement as of 1 August 2025 goods originating from Japan will be subject to 25%, Bangladesh - 35%, Bosnia and Herzegovina – 30%, Cambodia – 36%, Indonesia -32%, Kazakhstan - 25%, Laos – 40%, Malaysia – 25%, Myanmar – 40%, Serbia – 35%, South Africa – 30%, South Korea – 25%, Thailand – 36% and Tunisia – 25%. The US administration also reserve themselves the right to send revision reciprocal tariff letter to other countries.
EU adopted 17th package of sanctions against Russia
The 17th package of EU sanctions against Russia introduces the most extensive measures to date, primarily targeting Russia’s shadow fleet of oil tankers and expanding restrictions on technologies and entities supporting the Russian war effort. The package lists 189 additional vessels involved in transporting Russian oil, bringing the total to 342, and subject them to port access and services bans, making it significantly harder and costlier for Russia to export oil and evade the price cap. It also adds 31 new companies – both Russian and from third countries – to the sanctions list for supporting Russia’s military – industrial complex or engaging in sanctions circumvention and expands export restrictions on dual-use and advanced technology items, such as chemical precursors for missile propellants and spare parts for high-precision machine tools.
Additionally, the package includes 75 new listings of individuals and entities, mainly from the Russian military and defence sectors, who are now subject to asset freezes, travel bans, and prohibitions on making economic resources available to them. These measures are complemented by new criteria targeting shadow fleet enablers and actors involved in the looting of cultural heritage or activities in occupied territories. The package also extends the exemption from the oil price cap for crude oil transported from Russia’s Sakhalin-2 project to Japan, ensuring Japan’s energy security until 2026. Overall, these provisions aim to further restrict Russia’s access to critical resources and revenue, increasing economic pressure and complicating its ability to sustain its war against Ukraine.
EU customs reform – Council reached an agreement
The EU is undertaking a fundamental reform of its customs framework to modernize and strengthen the way customs authorities manage increasing trade volumes, especially in e-commerce, and to better enforce EU standards at the border. Key elements of the reform include the creation of a new decentralised EU customs authority to coordinate risk management and crisis response, and the establishment of a single EU customs data hub, which will be an online platform where businesses can submit customs information once for all consignments. The reform also introduces enhanced customs simplifications for the most trusted traders, a new category called “trust and check traders” and maintains the existing authorised economic operator (AEO) scheme to support SMEs. Additionally, a handling fee will be introduced for small consignments entering the EU through distance selling.
With the Council’s agreement on a partial negotiating mandate, interinstitutional negotiations with the European Parliament will now begin on the core aspects of the reform. Some issues, such as the location of the new EU customs authority, the design of a simplified tariff system, and the specifics of the handling fee, will be addressed in later discussions. The overall aim is to provide customs authorities with more effective tools to protect the Single Market, ensure efficient collection of duties, and facilitate legitimate trade without imposing unnecessary burdens on businesses or authorities.
ECJ Tauritus case – provisional prices
The European Court of Justice’s judgment, which was released on 15 May 2025, in Tauritus UAB case clarifies that importers can use the transaction value method for customs valuation even when the final price of imported goods is unknown at the time of importation, provided the final price is later determined based on objective, contractually agreed factors such as market prices or exchange rates. In such cases, importers should initially declare a provisional value using a simplified customs declaration and submit a supplementary declaration once the final price is established. The Court distinguished this scenario from the Hamamatsu case, emphasizing that only prices determined by objective, pre-agreed criteria-not unilateral adjustments- are suitable for this approach. The judgment highlights the importance of transparent, contractually defined pricing mechanisms and strict adherence to customs procedures, as customs authorities may scrutinize provisional or transfer pricing arrangements more closely. If you would like to read more about decision of the court and its implications for businesses, please check our blog post.