EU Direct Tax news alert

Spanish Supreme Court Judgment on dividends taxation for non-resident investment funds

The Spanish Supreme Court ruled on 13 November 2019 that the Spanish tax treatment of investment funds resident in third countries (the U.S., in this specific case) constitutes a breach of the free movement of capital (art. 63 TFEU). Therefore, all the discriminatory withholding tax (WHT) levied on dividends paid to those funds must be refunded with compound interest.

Background

In April 2014, the CJEU ruled in the Emerging Markets Series of DFA Investment Trust Company case (C-190/12) that, Article 63 TFEU on the free movement of capital applies to dividends paid by companies established in an EU Member State to investment funds established in a non-Member State(the U.S. in this case). Therefore, if the investment fund based in a non-EU/EEA country is able to prove it is comparable to an EU investment fund, and there is a regulatory framework of exchange of information between both countries, any kind of tax discrimination is prohibited.

Based on the CJEU’s judgment, many US investment funds started claim processes in Spain in order to recover the excess of taxation suffered.

In the case decided by the Spanish Supreme Court, in February 2017, the Spanish High Court of Justice of Madrid declared that the dividend WHT taxation applied to the claimant (a U.S. investment fund) was not in breach of EU Law because it considered that the situations were not comparable nor the exchange of information mechanisms in force were enough to verify that the US regulatory framework is equivalent to the Spanish one.

Previous Supreme Court Judgments

In March 2019, the Spanish Supreme Court established that the WHT levied on dividends paid to EU UCITS harmonized under Directive 2009/65/EC was in breach of EU principles of non-discrimination (art. 18 TFEU) and free movement of capital (art. 63 TFEU). Consequently, the Supreme Court granted the refund of the difference between the WHT suffered and the taxation corresponding to a Spanish resident UCITS (1 %), plus late payment interest.

The Supreme Court judgment

Based on the above precedents, the Supreme Court had to decide on two different matters:

(i)   Whether investment funds resident in third countries had to comply with all requirements of Spanish Law on investment funds in order to pass the comparability analysis.

(ii) Whether the existing exchange of information mechanisms with the US are sufficient to check the information provided by the investment funds.

The Court answered the first question by reference to the CJEU case C-190/12, concluding that it is not justified to oblige to the non-resident investment fund to prove the compliance of all requirements of Spanish Law on investment funds in order to pass the comparability analysis. It is sufficient to justify that the investment fund is subject to a regulatory framework equivalent to the EU Directives. Regarding the second question, the Court declared that it is evident that the exchange of information mechanisms with the U.S. are sufficient to check the information provided by the investment fund.

PwC's EU Direct Tax Group

EUDTG is PwC’s pan-European network of EU law experts. We specialise in all areas of direct tax, including the fundamental freedoms, EU directives and State aid rules. You will be only too well aware that EU direct tax law is moving quickly, and it’s difficult to keep up. But, it is crucial that taxpayers with an EU or EEA presence understand the impact as they explore their activities, opportunities and investment decisions. Find out more on: https://www.pwc.com/eudtg

Outcome and opportunities

The Supreme Court declared that the tax treatment provided in the Spanish Law to investment funds resident in third states (US) constitutes a breach of the free movement of capital (art. 63 TFEU) and, therefore, all the discriminatory WHT levied on dividends paid to those funds must be refunded.

This is the most relevant development of the last few years in Spain regarding the so-called "Fokus Bank" claims. Accordingly, EU and non-EU (e.g. Swiss) investment funds should analyse the impact of this decision and consider applying for a refund of withholding tax on dividends received from their Spanish investments. 

PwC Switzerland has been successfully coordinating claims for its clients investment- as well as pension funds resident in the EU and in Switzerland and has already obtained several positive decisions from the authorities and/or the courts in several European countries.

 

Contact us

Begga Sigurdardottir

Begga Sigurdardottir

Tax Partner, PwC Switzerland

Tel: +41 58 792 4564

Benjamin De Zordi

Benjamin De Zordi

TLS Partner, PwC Switzerland

Tel: +41 58 792 43 17